Tracker:
This bill gets the status Became legislation
Here you will find the actions for reputation of Legislation:
- Constitutional Authority Statement
- CBO Price Estimates 1
Subject — Policy Area:
- Crime and Police
- View subjects
Overview: H.R.1865 — 115th Congress (2017-2018) All Information (Except Text)
Shown Here: Public Law No: 115-164 (04/11/2018)
Enable States and Victims to battle on the web Intercourse Trafficking Act of 2017
(Sec. 2) This bill expresses the feeling of Congress that part 230 of this Communications Act of 1934 wasn’t meant to offer appropriate security to sites that unlawfully mixxxer mobile site promote and facilitate prostitution and web sites that facilitate traffickers in marketing the sale of illegal sex functions with intercourse trafficking victims. Area 230 restrictions the liability that is legal of computer companies or users for content they publish that has been produced by other people.
(Sec. 3) The bill amends the federal unlawful rule to add a brand new part that imposes penalties—a fine, a jail term all the way to 10 years, or both—on somebody who, utilizing a facility or way of interstate or international business, has, manages, or operates an interactive computer solution (or efforts or conspires to do this) to market or facilitate the prostitution of some other individual.
Furthermore, it establishes improved penalties—a fine, a jail term of as much as 25 years, or both—for an individual who commits the offense in another of the following aggravating circumstances: (1) promotes or facilitates the prostitution of five or higher individuals, or (2) acts with careless neglect that such conduct plays a role in sex trafficking.
An individual hurt by the aggravated offense may recover damages and solicitors’ costs in a federal civil action.
A court must purchase mandatory restitution, as well as other unlawful or civil charges, for an aggravated offense by which someone acts with reckless disregard that such conduct plays a part in sex trafficking.
A defendant may assert, as an affirmative protection, that the advertising or facilitation of prostitution is appropriate within the jurisdiction where it absolutely was targeted.
(Sec. 4) The bill amends the Communications Act of 1934 to declare that area 230 will not restrict: (1) a federal civil claim for conduct that constitutes sex trafficking, (2) a federal unlawful fee for conduct that constitutes sex trafficking, or (3) a situation unlawful fee for conduct that promotes or facilitates prostitution in breach with this bill.
The amendments apply regardless of whether so-called conduct happens prior to, on, or after this bill’s enactment.
(Sec. 5) The bill amends the federal code that is criminal determine a expression pertaining to the prohibition on sex trafficking. Presently, it a criminal activity to knowingly take advantage of involvement in a venture that engages in intercourse trafficking. This bill describes “participation in a endeavor” to suggest knowingly assisting, supporting, or assisting a intercourse trafficking breach.
(Sec. 6) a situation may register a federal action that is civil enforce federal intercourse trafficking violations.
(Sec. 7) This section states that this bill doesn’t restrict federal or state civil actions or criminal prosecutions which are maybe maybe maybe not preempted by part 230 for the Communications Act of 1934.
(Sec. 8) the federal government Accountability workplace must report to Congress on information linked to damages and mandatory restitution for aggravated offenses under this bill.
